Can anyone who has the resources "boss" how to reasonably allocate resources?
2018-06-21 01:00:13
Now, the status of resources on a global scale can not be underestimated - a bit of trouble in the Middle East, a bit of natural disasters in South America will increase the price of crude oil in the world to further increase. The oil that has risen to more than 60 US dollars a barrel has indeed become the lever of liquid gold in the eyes of people and the economic structure. In the world, the causes of this condescending status of the resources are quite complex. In the final analysis, it is a manifestation of a heated struggle for economic interests. The end of the position may even lead to war. Ultimately, it will be a huge obstacle to speeding up the world economy. The point of view is unresolved.
As a big country, our country has a vast territory, especially the resources needed to develop the chemical industry. However, as with the uneven distribution of resources in the world, the distribution of domestic chemical resources is also uneven. For example, the northwest is rich in coal, Xinjiang is the first oil and gas, the phosphate is only in the Yunnan-Guizhou-Echuan, and the potassium is only in Qinghai... In the face of this situation, how should our chemical industry develop? Is it based on resource segregation or is it an overall solution to the overall consideration? This relates to the development and layout of the entire industry, and relates to whether or not our hard-laid fixed assets since the founding of the People's Republic will become a pile of scrap iron in the near future, and whether it can make our economy as economical as possible with limited resources and national strength. Efficient development.
In the era of planned economy, it is the nation's overall layout. For example, to build a chemical fertilizer plant, it is necessary to take into account the balance of provinces, cities, and counties, taking into account the priorities of major grain-producing provinces. At the same time, we must also plan for the development and use of resources. Later, when the government was reformed, the decentralization of the central government gave local governments more autonomy, which greatly stimulated the enthusiasm of local governments to make full use of their resources. One coal chemical base in the western region is springing up and one of the southwestern phosphorus chemical bases is still in operation. These bases are frequently used for billions or even billions of dollars in investment, so that provinces that do not have resources actually do so. At the same time, coal and chemical ore out of the province is no longer so simple, or to pay a considerable amount of "entrance fee", or simply under the "satisfaction of the province" under the pretext of not allowing the province. It has been reported this year that phosphate fertilizer companies in Zhejiang have stopped production due to the scarcity of phosphate ore. No wonder people sigh: Now who has the resources who is the boss!
Whoever has the resources and who is the boss has problems with this. Jurisprudentially, resources are owned by the entire people, and no one has the right to arbitrarily control it. That is, in a capitalist country, individuals with resources cannot hold resources to do whatever they like. Why did we abandon the planned economy for economic reform? It is because experience has proved that the market economy can allocate resources more rationally than the planned economy, and it can also mobilize the creativity of the broad masses of workers. However, if it evolves into who owns the resources under the buttocks who can get together and even use the resources in their hands to “exploit†neighboring provinces, then it completely deviates from the original intention of the reform, not to mention the market economy.
In our country, there will not be wars because of competition for resources. However, if there is a large area of ​​repeated construction of a project in a certain area due to contention and abuse of resources and a large area of ​​enterprises in a certain area is shut down, the cost is no less than a war. . The great loss of resources and the enormous internal friction of human and financial resources may even affect future generations.
If "who has the resources and who is the boss" has become a reality, then the state policy departments should be alert to reflect on the current social investment system, assessment system, distribution system ... to find a more reasonable resource allocation and use as soon as possible. The way. For the development of the chemical industry, such reforms are really necessary.
As a big country, our country has a vast territory, especially the resources needed to develop the chemical industry. However, as with the uneven distribution of resources in the world, the distribution of domestic chemical resources is also uneven. For example, the northwest is rich in coal, Xinjiang is the first oil and gas, the phosphate is only in the Yunnan-Guizhou-Echuan, and the potassium is only in Qinghai... In the face of this situation, how should our chemical industry develop? Is it based on resource segregation or is it an overall solution to the overall consideration? This relates to the development and layout of the entire industry, and relates to whether or not our hard-laid fixed assets since the founding of the People's Republic will become a pile of scrap iron in the near future, and whether it can make our economy as economical as possible with limited resources and national strength. Efficient development.
In the era of planned economy, it is the nation's overall layout. For example, to build a chemical fertilizer plant, it is necessary to take into account the balance of provinces, cities, and counties, taking into account the priorities of major grain-producing provinces. At the same time, we must also plan for the development and use of resources. Later, when the government was reformed, the decentralization of the central government gave local governments more autonomy, which greatly stimulated the enthusiasm of local governments to make full use of their resources. One coal chemical base in the western region is springing up and one of the southwestern phosphorus chemical bases is still in operation. These bases are frequently used for billions or even billions of dollars in investment, so that provinces that do not have resources actually do so. At the same time, coal and chemical ore out of the province is no longer so simple, or to pay a considerable amount of "entrance fee", or simply under the "satisfaction of the province" under the pretext of not allowing the province. It has been reported this year that phosphate fertilizer companies in Zhejiang have stopped production due to the scarcity of phosphate ore. No wonder people sigh: Now who has the resources who is the boss!
Whoever has the resources and who is the boss has problems with this. Jurisprudentially, resources are owned by the entire people, and no one has the right to arbitrarily control it. That is, in a capitalist country, individuals with resources cannot hold resources to do whatever they like. Why did we abandon the planned economy for economic reform? It is because experience has proved that the market economy can allocate resources more rationally than the planned economy, and it can also mobilize the creativity of the broad masses of workers. However, if it evolves into who owns the resources under the buttocks who can get together and even use the resources in their hands to “exploit†neighboring provinces, then it completely deviates from the original intention of the reform, not to mention the market economy.
In our country, there will not be wars because of competition for resources. However, if there is a large area of ​​repeated construction of a project in a certain area due to contention and abuse of resources and a large area of ​​enterprises in a certain area is shut down, the cost is no less than a war. . The great loss of resources and the enormous internal friction of human and financial resources may even affect future generations.
If "who has the resources and who is the boss" has become a reality, then the state policy departments should be alert to reflect on the current social investment system, assessment system, distribution system ... to find a more reasonable resource allocation and use as soon as possible. The way. For the development of the chemical industry, such reforms are really necessary.
Sand Gravel Pump,Dredging Pumps Co., Ltd. , http://www.nspumpparts.com